Ban the Burger Month

Categories:

May is “National Hamburger Month,” an annual “tradition” that began 18 years ago when White Castle, purveyor of small, tasty, high-calorie burgers, initiated it.

It should be “Ban the Burger Month” instead.

Cartoon by Alen Lauzan Falcon, Santiago, Chile
Cartoon by Alen Lauzan Falcon, Santiago, Chile

It figures that a capitalistic organization would promote such a thing.

According to about.com, White Castle, in 1921, was the first to introduce the mass distribution of the burger. The concept was an immediate hit.

By the ’30s, Americans were getting too fat and lazy to get out of their cars to order their burgers. Greedy corporations created the drive-in burger joint to exploit them.

In the late ’30s, fat, lazy Americans began demanding bigger burgers. Bob’s Big Boy took advantage by introducing the first double-patty burger.

But it was during the postwar years, when Americans had expendable dough, that burger makers would really begin exploiting Americans.

In 1948, the first McDonald’s opened — and the modern fast-food era was born. To fuel the American addiction to fast, high-calorie burgers, McDonald’s opened joints across the country like some kind of roadside litter.

Thanks to corporate exploitation, hamburgers now account for nearly 60 percent of all sandwiches eaten.

But rather than celebrate the burger every May, we must do the opposite: give the highly-educated, caring people who run our federal government the power, through a nationwide burger ban, to protect us from exploitive corporate interests.

Americans are among the fattest people on Earth. This is largely because the fast-food hamburger is little more than a high-calorie injection system.

Now that the federal government has assumed regulatory command over America’s health care — now that federal money will be used to subsidize it — the government has every right to limit behavior that will increase health care costs.

The government must also ban any advertising and/or media programming that seeks to promote, and/or profit from, America’s lingering obsession with the burger.

That it is still legal for Ronald McDonald to brainwash our children into consuming a mass-produced corporate Happy Meal leaves highly educated people everywhere unhappy.

Further, the Federal Communications Commission must censor television shows, such as “Diners, Drive-Ins and Dives” and “Man vs. Food.”

In the former show, host Guy Fieri exploits the reckless calorie consumption of average-intelligence Americans who, when they are not clinging to their guns and their religion, are stuffing their gullets at the local diner.

In the latter, host Adam Richman travels the country to participate in grotesque contests to see who can consume the most high-calorie comfort foods.

Both food opportunists are tantamount to food pornographers.

Banning and censoring American burger-mill operations, however, is only part of the solution.

The government must also ban the American pastime of freely grilling burgers, and the flesh of other dead animals, on backyard barbecues — all of which emit carcinogens and other harmful pollutants into the atmosphere.

I know it is difficult for Americans of average intelligence to comprehend, but a federal ban on burger consumption is what is best for them.

It will reduce calorie consumption, reduce federal health care expenditures and protect the environment.

It will result in less cow grazing, which will minimize cow flatulence, a menace to hundreds who deserve the right to an odorless countryside drive in their electric cars on Sundays.

Change is hard — giving up backward, primitive American traditions will be difficult for many — but we must work together to bring about this needed change.

In a truly progressive society, May must become Ban the Burger Month instead.

—–

©2010 Tom Purcell. Tom Purcell, a humor columnist for the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, is nationally syndicated exclusively by Cagle Cartoons newspaper syndicate. For more info contact Cari Dawson Bartley at 800 696 7561 or email [email protected]. Visit Tom on the web at www.TomPurcell.com or e-mail him at [email protected].


Comments

7 responses to “Ban the Burger Month”

  1. Mexia Avatar
    Mexia

    Well, we certainly have the right government in place to limit the behavior of Americans and ban the actions of profit-making businesses. Maybe the government could take 100% of our salaries as well and just give us what they think we should have. How about only letting those of "superior" intelligence vote? Isn't it possible to use Federal tax monies for projects to benefit the populations of "blue" states? How about not paying those of "average" intelligence anything for their labor, just give them some food, clothing, and a place to live?

  2. Stug Avatar
    Stug

    "How about not paying those of “average” intelligence anything for their labor, just give them some food, clothing, and a place to live?"

    – We effectively have that already, it's called trickle-down economics.

  3. chris Avatar
    chris

    I don't think the other commentors get that the article is sarcastic. Yay for satire!….. But seriously screw you, I can eat what i want! LOL

  4. geoff Avatar

    chris: "I can eat what i want!" I actually found that was a problem in the US. Somehow I was having an allergic reaction to something, but the doctors couldn't figure out what. They thought it might be hormones or antibiotics in the milk I was drinking, but because the exact contents are a corporate secret… we couldn't find out what the source was, exactly. Dying as a result of some secret additive in the milk I was also serving my kids was, needless to say, not high on the list of things I really "want."

  5. Bob Avatar
    Bob

    At what point in history did us Americans become so dependent on "Big Brother" to make our decisions for us? As a free American, exercising my right to free speech, I absolutely resent your 'Socialist' ideology. Maybe you weren't hugged enough when you were a child and now need the comfort of Big Brothers' security , holding your hand, and making decisions for you. You are right about one thing. When Big Brother starts flipping the bill, he will undoubtedly start regulating our lives in ways you can't even imagine. Why don't we just ban meat all together and get our protein through a government issue pill form? What ever happened to personal responsibility, dignity, independent citizens, Individualism? Socialism has always been rejected in this country and now it hides behind the label of Liberalism. Are you blind to the fact, that this country fought so hard to be free independent citizens? I think you are. The regulation needs to stop at home and not get passed on to the government. History has proven, without a doubt, that freedom is a very hard struggle to redeem. If it is in your best interest to live out this ultimate Utopian solution that you have provided for us. Then I personally volunteer, as Big Brother, to hold your hand, put you on your own little row boat, and send you across the Atlantic where you might fit in better.

    I'll let you decide if I'm being sarcastic or not.

  6. Good Life Avatar
    Good Life

    Actually all it would take would be for the consumers to see what actually goes into "100% beef". Beef is anything that comes out of a bovine type critter. Anyone that eats "100% beef" need not laugh at those that eat haggis. Yes, that's right. Absolutely any part of a bovine that can be ground up goes into those "burgers". Notice they use "burger" rather than "hamburger". The government defines the words and "hamburger" is different from "burger". And not only is a burger anything bovine, the consumer should look at what the critter looked like before it hit the grinder. These are not prime or even choice. (Of course, even the definition of prime and choice has been lowered, but that's another education) These are the old and sick. Yes, sick. The only limitation is the critter must be able to walk. (Which is a raising of the standard. Before "mad cow" the only requirement was that they were still breathing.) If they can walk they can be burger. The areas that have cancer or other disease are cut out but the rest goes in.

    There are actually slaughtering plants that specialize in fast food critters. A good critter "on the hoof" goes for 80 cents to $1.25 per pound. The critters that go to the fast food plants go for 15-25 cents per pound. Gives you an idea what the quality of these critters is. And gives you an idea why they can have a "dollar menu".

    Remember this the next time you swing through that drive through.

  7. Judy Avatar
    Judy

    Tom, I was wondering if you have a sister in Chicago, named Sheri. If yes, then we are cousins…….j

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *