On Fixer-Uppers

Categories:

If only more Americans had bought fixer-uppers.

Maybe I better explain.

My first house was in need of major renovations. Boy, did my father and I suffer when we improved the bathroom.

The project started well enough. We tore down the old wall tile and put up wallpaper and a tub surround. We repainted, then put down a new floor. All we had to do to was reinstall the commode.

housing market
Cartoon by John Darkow – Columbia Daily Tribune (click to reprint)

The bolts that had secured the toilet to the floor had both broken. The hardware-store guy sold me a kit to reattach them.

My father spent an hour reattaching the bolts. But as we attempted to fish the bolts through the commode’s bolt holes, we discovered they were too short.

“Son of a … !” said my father.

“The idiots gave us the wrong bolts!” I said.

I raced to the hardware store and bought longer bolts. My father spent another hour getting them in place. We were finally able to reattach the commode.

But another problem arose: the wax goop that seals the commode to the sewage pipe wasn’t thick enough to seal anything.

“Son of a … !!” said my father.

“The idiots gave us the wrong goop!” I said.

After another visit to the hardware store, our third attempt to secure the toilet succeeded. But we needed to reattach the water fittings.

To reattach the water fittings, you have to wedge your body between the tub and the commode. Then you have to screw the water-line bolt, made of metal, into a plastic pipe coming from the commode. But they won’t screw together.

So you have to keep trying to screw them together until you bang your head on the commode, which makes you angry, so you attempt to stand quickly, which kicks the newly-laid tile out of place, and then you bang your shin on the toilet, which causes you to throw whatever you’re holding through the bathroom window.

Eventually, we got the metal water-line bolt to screw into the plastic pipe — but we stripped the threads. When we turned the water back on, a leak sprouted that made Niagara Falls look like a lap pool.

“Son of a … !!” shouted my father.

“The idiots!” I said.

I raced back to the hardware store and bought every plumbing fitting ever designed by man: glue, sealant, putty, rubber washers, pumps.

Eventually, we got the commode installed. We got the sink installed. We sealed every leak. The miserable job took several hours more than we had planned.

If more Americans were willing to have such experiences, we’d all be better off.

You see, in the sensible old days, before Americans bought massive houses they couldn’t afford and paid more than those massive houses were worth, Americans were cautious and frugal.

The smarter folks shopped around — they bought modest, fixer-upper houses for less than market value. They weren’t afraid to get their hands dirty to produce wealth.

They came to appreciate how difficult it is to grow wealth — they knew that eventually they could sell their house at a gain and use it to buy a nicer house.

Of course, that was before our government kicked off the housing bubble by lowering lending standards — before Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac bought millions in bad mortgages written by reckless brokers who knew they could sell the bad loans.

It was before greedy Wall Street morons overexposed their firms for millions in short-term bonuses — before American home buyers routinely assumed the boom times would never end.

Well, the bubble finally burst and the economy hit the skids. Now millions are learning about wealth creation the hard way.

If only they’d bought a fixer-upper.

—–

©2010 Tom Purcell. Tom Purcell, a humor columnist for the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, is nationally syndicated exclusively by Cagle Cartoons newspaper syndicate. For more info contact Cari Dawson Bartley at 800 696 7561 or email [email protected]. Visit Tom on the web at www.TomPurcell.com or e-mail him at [email protected].


Comments

12 responses to “On Fixer-Uppers”

  1. mole Avatar
    mole

    Ah, the "good old days" where guys like me weren't afraid to get our hands dirty "to produce wealth". Not like today. If only modern Americans weren't more like me. blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. This guy spouts drivel.

  2. geoff Avatar
    geoff

    "If more Americans were willing to have such experiences, we’d all be better off." I thought the whole point of doing that was learning to hire a pro the next time.

    "Now millions are learning about wealth creation the hard way." Right: don't gamble on real estate. It makes more sense to invest in something like industry or technology that actually produces jobs and creates real (not paper) wealth. But you can't really do that if you're busy outsourcing and downsizing and converting real work into McJobs.

    Better watch it, though, or Cal will complain about you insulting "greedy Wall Street morons."

  3. ellis Avatar
    ellis

    over a rather long life i have done a lot of jobs in my homes to repair or renew things. almost every one is a small project that becomes a large project before completion. i try to avaoid all thet now by hiring people who know what they are doing and let them alone. the job gets done, it is done correctly, and everyone involved feels better for it.

    it is true, doing projects that are detailed in the column tecahes you not to do such projects but hire those that know how.

  4. Cal Avatar
    Cal

    I think I’ve complained about Purcell’s writing style enough but this is the sort of thing he and Martha Carr are good at. I guess it has its place.

    Seems to me the article has a deeper meaning than just hiring the right guy for the right job.

    It’s telling us as individuals not to buy what we can’t afford even when the enticing offer of a low starter interest rates seems too good to be true. It’s telling us to make due with what we have until we’re sure we really and can afford something newer, better, or faster. At the most basic level it is what ellis said although if you’re still young and handy around the house you do save a ton on labor costs IF you can do it right yourself.

    Lastly, it’s also an admonition to the government to stop “buying” (or in our case just “spending” money) what it can’t afford. It took us 206 years to amass our first trillion in debt. Last year it took us just six months to go from $12 to $13 trillion in debt. Republicans are just as guilty for building this mountain of debt but the Obama team has put them all to shame as rank amateurs.

    Here’s another in a never-end stream of legitimate warnings about global financial problems looming on the horizon.

    http://finance.yahoo.com/news/China-warns-debt-wo

    No country can sustain cradle-to-grave entitlements as we saw in Greece. Who’s next rather than “will there be a next” is the real question. Let’s stop this runaway spending and make sure it isn’t the U.S.

    Even Canada’s having to face reality.

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20100531/hl_nm/us_heal

  5. mole Avatar
    mole

    Cal – the article you pointed to was written by Claire Sibonney; a right-wing journalist who delves into issues with her mind already made up, using cherry-picking techniques and partial quotes to sell the conservative agenda. She used to write for the National Pest (oops, I mean Post), Canada's foremost far-right rag. Take what she writes with a huge truck full of NaCl.

  6. geoff Avatar

    mole: "Cal – the article you pointed to was written by Claire Sibonney; a right-wing journalist who delves into issues with her mind already made up, using cherry-picking techniques and partial quotes to sell the conservative agenda."

    You mean to say that all that she says about Canada's provinces taking tough measures is a lie?

    or

    that Healthcare in Canada delivered through the publicly funded system, which covers all "medically necessary" hospital and physician care and curbs the role of private medicine, ate up about 40 percent of provincial budgets, or some C$183 billion ($174 billion) last year is a lie?

    Or is it a lie that Ontario says healthcare could eat up 70 percent of its budget in 12 years, if all these costs are left unchecked?

    I used a lot of NaCl mole, but I do not see evidence that proves all this wrong?

    Please provide references.

  7. geoff Avatar

    Too much salt is injurious to health mole.

    Use a little less or the government will tax you for that.

  8. AUTHOR UNKNOWN Avatar

    geoff: I don't think people would go that route again. Friedrich the Great used to tax salt, and forced people to buy a minimum quantity of it every year. Did great work for the impoverished farmers of some of the lower-lying, swampier parts of Brandenburg he tried to settle, who set themselves up to making a whole lot of pickles, having nothing else to do with so much expensive salt and crappy land.

    You also fail to recognise that the Conservative Party has more or less been paralleling your Republican policies: tax cuts for the rich, cutting funding for important programs, all for the benefit of "fiscal responsibility" (aka trying to reduce gov't to a size where it could be drowned in the bathtub, as one of your prominent wingnuts described it). Somehow they have this idea that, if they cut funds for health care far enough, Canadians will start clamouring for an American-style, expensive, inefficient, for-profit system, and they can either hand out the contracts to their buddies or retire to nice, cushy sinecures working for American health care corporations (i.e. "death panels") when they leave politics. The Canadian Conservative Party agenda has aimed at selling the country out from under our feet since at least the 1950s, and hasn't even tried to hide the fact since Mulroney handed over the keys to Reagan.

    It must be nice to be able to see everything in black and white, with no sense of either nuance or context, cause and effect. "Shit happens," as they say, and out of the blue BP starts gushing oil; the Canadian health care system starts showing signs of underfunding without considering how that happened in the first place, etc.

  9. Cal Avatar
    Cal

    Mole. I see. She’s a conservative therefore her piece can’t be fact-based and should be (must be?) dismissed outright. I’ll keep that in mind next time I look at something from The Heritage Foundation or the Drudge Report I agree with! Based on this standard, I think you’ll agree with my assessment of Dupuy’s latest “article” on the oil spill since she writes for a leftwing rag that it should be dismissed out of hand. Seems only fair, right? Er, Left?

    The point on cradle-to-grave entitlements is valid. Europe is being crushed under their weight and the Obama-led US is trying to do the same here. That’s how we spent ONE TRILLION dollars more than we had in just six months last year. What’s not to like about _that_???

  10. geoff Avatar

    Cal: "The point on cradle-to-grave entitlements is valid. Europe is being crushed under their weight."

    Really? That's probably why mole & everyone else discounts "conservative" pieces, not because they necessarily "can't be fact-based" but because they almost never are. Have any, Cal?

    "That’s how we spent ONE TRILLION dollars more than we had in just six months last year." Hmm. Not Bush's budget, not the bail-outs for Wall Street and the big banks that gambled on the real estate bubble. Just… welfare? Medicare? Wars? What?

    Facts, Cal: you'd be almost semi-credible if you provided a few, just once in a while, instead of providing us all with these fleeting references to them.

  11. Cal Avatar
    Cal

    Thanks mole. Great response. It’s weird but my computer seems to have turned your name into someone called geoff or gooff or something. (That happens a lot. I respond to someone and then when they answer back their name becomes this golff guy. Strange.)

    Must be a virus. I’ll have to run a Norton virus scan to see what’s going on.

  12. mole Avatar
    mole

    Cal – You are correct that I shouldn't dismiss an opinion outright simply because it comes from a conservative. But the point that I made was " she delves into issues with her mind already made up, using cherry-picking techniques and partial quotes to sell the conservative agenda". She's often disingenuous by quoting references out of context or only partially.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *