The Politics of the Gulf Oil Spill

Categories:

Since last month’s oil-spill disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, two very different leadership styles have been on display. On the one hand we have President Obama, who took nine days before making a public statement on the spill. On the other, we have Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, who has been intensely and vocally involved from the beginning.

Gulf oil spill Obama Katrina
Cartoon by John Darkow – Columbia Daily Tribune (click to purchase)

Now, we must all recognize that during the course of a presidency unexpected and unprecedented events will occur that cannot be blamed on the administration. And this is one of those cases. However, it is not always the event itself that causes the most trouble — it is the response to the situation that usually gets you.

In the wake of recent criticism, President Obama has been forced to backtrack and step up his attention to the oil spill. The spill — which may have already released 90 million gallons of oil into the Gulf and has now reached the marshes of Louisiana, “oiling” some 84 miles of the coast —is undoubtedly the greatest national disaster of the Obama presidency. Yet despite intense Democratic criticism for President Bush’s response to a natural disaster, Hurricane Katrina, in this same state, President Obama’s response has been underwhelming, to say the least.

Under the justification of maintaining a regular schedule and demonstrating calm, President Obama has cavalierly gone about with casual events, even fundraisers, choosing to keep most of his disaster response effort private. So private, in fact, that those of us living far away from the slick might even be forgiven for forgetting about it.

This is not a superficial matter for a president. Even if President Obama’s administration were, in fact, exercising the highest level of competency in dealing with the catastrophe, it is the job of a president to handle not only the practical matters of government, but to also be the public face to encourage, motivate, and inform the public. This is a job he is failing.

Down in Louisiana, people have seen a very different story. Gov. Jindal has engaged completely in all aspects of disaster relief efforts. He has been a tireless advocate for his state, challenging mistaken federal approaches and pressuring BP to make every possible effort to quell this spill. And when the focus is fully switched to clean-up efforts, the people of Louisiana can have every confidence that Gov. Jindal will continue in the manner he has begun.

BP’s latest attempt to staunch the oil, their “top kill” tactic, is now underway. This effort will involve pumping an intense concentration of heavy mud and cement into the oil flow in an effort to staunch the flow. Initial results are promising, but only time will tell how effective this will be.

Right now, residents of the Gulf Coast need the administration to demonstrate the type of leadership being exercised by Gov. Bobby Jindal. President Obama is now talking about the future of off-shore drilling, placing additional restrictions and extending the moratorium on drilling. None of this, however, deals with the realities of the oil currently pouring into the ocean, and the livelihoods of Louisianans which are being destroyed.

Again we see a pattern of lackluster efforts from our president. Words and a veneer of calm are not a demonstration of leadership. They do not serve as action and progress. And coming from an administration whose party trounced President Bush for his conduct in the Gulf, such “leadership” is not only ineffective, but actually hypocritical.

I will be watching with the rest of the country to see where the President goes from here. I hope he will exceed the pattern he has shown us so far. And in the meantime, my prayers and support are with Gov. Jindal and the good people of Louisiana in the face of this tragedy.

—–

Mike Reagan, the elder son of the late President Ronald Reagan, is spokesperson for The Reagan PAC (www.thereaganpac.com) and chairman and president of The Reagan Legacy Foundation (www.reaganlegacyfoundation.org). Look for Mike’s books and other information at www.Reagan.com. E-mail comments to [email protected].

©2010 Mike Reagan. If you’re not a paying subscriber to our service, you must contact us to print or Web post this column. Mike’s column is distributed exclusively by: Cagle Cartoons, Inc., newspaper syndicate. For info contact Cari Dawson Bartley. E-mail [email protected], (800) 696-7561.


Comments

11 responses to “The Politics of the Gulf Oil Spill”

  1. abc Avatar

    Such technical comments from someone who probably never opened a clogged drain.

  2. Susan Avatar
    Susan

    Oh boy! Another chance to complain about Obama. Never mind that both Bushes and the wonderful Sarah Palin thought drilling in the gulf was a great idea. What did you want him to do? Dive down and cap the leak himself? Micheal Reagan is just another critic who doesn't have any idea what he is talking about. If he knows so much about the leak have him fix it. If not just shut up.

  3. ArtW Avatar
    ArtW

    Susan: "What did you want him to do? Dive down and cap the leak himself?"

    I'll be surprised if Obama doesn't claim that he did.

  4. Jonathan Avatar
    Jonathan

    So, Jindal waits to build the sandbars needed to protect his state's shorelines because he can't get the Federal Government or BP to fund it, instead of doing it the American (and expedient) way of building those sandbars and then suing the people who should have paid for them. And that makes him a better manager of the crisis?

    I know I'm the worst armchair governer, sitting way up here in the Pacific Northwest, with no real clue as to what's going on down there, except from what I hear and read over the internet. But I do think this one little detail of decision making hasn't been addressed properly, by Jindal, Obama, or the media.

    Never mind that the traditional booms weren't placed properly to begin with.

  5. Cal Avatar
    Cal

    “Such technical comments from someone who probably never opened a clogged drain.” And such “academic” comments from someone who probably never finished college.

    As always, this issue is as partisan driven as most others. This morning I listened to a liberal attorney discuss the spill with a conservative NY Post reporter and it was hard to believe they were discussing the same issue. She blamed Bush (of course) for lax regulations and said Obama was in no way responsible for the spill and doing his best on the cleanup. I agree Obama (and Bush) are not responsible for the spill. BP is at fault. The Post reporter’s focus was on the parallels of the spill and Katrina and President Obama’s lack of timely response. He also noted that the responsibility for Katrina was a state issue whereas this is a federal responsibility because of where it happened. She then followed up by blaming Bush for Katrina because he failed to build a new levee to prevent the flooding and on and on it went.

    I’m not interested in assessing blame at this point. Let’s bring every possible resource to bear on the problem immediately and sort out the finger pointing down the road. That said, I do think the president has been very slow to react but I don’t think he bears any responsibility for the spill itself. That’s on BP lock, stock, and barrel of oil—thousands of barrels of oil. But he is responsible for coordinating the clean up with BP footing the bill.

  6. Cal Avatar
    Cal

    I'd like to also remind Susan if it wasn't for liberals forcing oil companies to drill so far away from shore, BP wouldn't be conducting this more dangerous operation of deep-water drilling. But let's keep blaming Sarah Palin and George Bush for every single bad thing that happens. That just NEVER gets old. No, sir. Never…

  7. Susan Avatar
    Susan

    You are right. It never gets old because they never stop. I notice though now Sarah Palin has shut up her "drill, baby, drill'" chant. But then, since she seems to know everything let her get the leak stopped. And I am sure Cal will have plenty to say about this post. Argueing for argueings sake is the way conservetes do things. talk it to death. And yes, I do know I misspelled some things.

  8. Cal Avatar
    Cal

    I don’t care about misspellings. That was Syncopation’s bailiwick until I had to fire him for missing so many in liberals’ posts!

    Susan. I wish you were agreeing with me that allowing oil exploration closer to shore would have made it easier and safer rather than that blaming Bush never gets old.

    And thanks for avoiding the unfounded stereotypes about conservatives. (Especially the ones that make no sense whatsoever because they can apply equally to anyone Left or Right.) I’ll assume by your quip about Palin you somehow think that’s an indication we should either stop drilling or further exploration, but since you didn’t offer any clarification I can’t be sure.

    Have you ever given any thought to what life would be like without oil? From the clothes we wear to the plastic cups we drink out of to all things mechanical and everything in between the quality of our lives depends on oil. Do you think we should stop or curtail drilling for oil? Wind and solar are MANY years from providing the power we need to sustain our economy. What’s your recommendation if we aren’t going to “drill, baby, drill?”

    That wasn’t too unpleasant, was it? 🙂

  9. geoff Avatar

    Jonathan: amazing they degraded wetlands for years, now all of a sudden (Katrina, need for sandbars) they realise that some of those "so-called experts" and "scientists" and engineers were right.

    "Wind and solar are MANY years from providing the power we need to sustain our economy." But Cal: you're not "sustaining" your economy. Your economy was bouyed up by a real estate bubble. Bubbles burst eventually. No sustainability there whatsoever. Walmart has been sucking the life out of your economy, too; as have high oil prices and the costs of your wars, and big Republican deficits, downsizing and outsourcing and McJobbing, etc. Your economy is down the toilet. Period. Why is it that other conservative gov'ts in places like Denmark and Germany think investing in alternative energy is a good idea; good for the economy, good for future growth, good for sustainability. Just your Party of "NO!!!" seems to be stuck in the stone age.

    Just keep repeating: Exxon is my friend; BP loves us! Halliburton is the best! Oil wells are good for fish and birds and all living things! Rush only has our best interests at heart.

  10. Wanda Avatar
    Wanda

    i want to know what the presendtial response including time frame was for the Vadez spill,anyone know?

  11. Cal Avatar
    Cal

    Wanda. Here’s a partial answer:

    May 27, 2010 – 10:35 ET

    Remember—we’re now 37 days into the BP oil spill.

    3/24/89 – Valdez accident

    4/7/89 – 14 days later

    “It took him a while to make up his mind. Fourteen days after the oil began pouring out of the Exxon Valdez into Prince William Sound, President Bush has ordered the federal government to take over control of the effort to clean it up, which makes it a hotter political issues, too little too late the Democrats are crying up on Capitol Hill.” – Peter Jennings

    4/8/89 – 15 days later

    “Decision to send troops (and equipment) is long overdue” – Dallas Morning News

    4/15/89 – 22 days later

    ALASKAN OIL SPILL; CRISIS NOT UNDER CONTROL DESPITE ALL THE PROMISES….

    THE inexcusable delay in the cleanup of the Exxon Valdez oil spill continues. More than a week after President Bush expressed interest in the catastrophe, little federal help has arrived on the oil-soaked beaches of Prince William Sound…” – Seattle Times

    4/20/89 – 27 days later

    “The Bush administration yesterday faced sharp criticism from the US Congress for not decisively taking control of the Exxon Valdez oil spill, as senators called for new laws that would require the president to direct such clean-up efforts in future.

    Senate majority leader George Mitchell said President Bush was "slow to comprehend the magnitude of this disaster" and valuable hours were lost after the Mar 24 spill in Alaska's Prince William Sound when it might still have been controlled.”

    4/23/89 – 30 Days Later

    How did this press coverage effect Bush? His handling of the environment dropped from 60 percent approval—to 39 percent approval …in 30 days. 21 points in 30 days. This wasn’t just the approval of the handling of the spill—it was his overall handling of the environment—-because the news was filled non-stop with oil drenched birds and criticism of the president for not doing enough.

    Timeline: What did the media say about Obama after the Gulf of Mexico Oil Disaster?

    May 27 2010

    In the days after oil spill Sean Hannity called the spill "Obama's Katrina," but it was actually George W. Bush's second Katrina. Vice President Dick Cheney, fresh from his days at Halliburton, had presided over the weakening of drilling regulations, including the exclusion of remote-shut-off switches (commonly used in the North Sea oil fields), which might have prevented the disaster.

    Read more: http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,…

    "Sean Hannity called the spill "Obama's Katrina," but it was actually George W. Bush's second Katrina. Vice President Dick Cheney, fresh from his days at Halliburton, had presided over the weakening of drilling regulations, including the exclusion of remote-shut-off switches (commonly used in the North Sea oil fields), which might have prevented the disaster." Time Magazine

    "People should be furious with Dick Cheney" Joy Behar

    "The deregulation movement since Reagan more or less gave oil its head. All the tools are in oil's toolkit. The Minerals Management Service was basically dismantled by G.W. Bush. The result is predictable and was predicted. Obama has a lot of work ahead of him. But it begins when industry figures out how to plug the well BP blew." Jed Horne

    "Nobody knows how to cap this well. We can't have that many off shore oil wells and have a president be responsible for each engineering problem." Professor Douglas Brinkley

    "Obama’s team has done a good job coordinating the cleanup so far. The president has been on top of it from the start."

    "Did Obama signal today that he grasps the magnitude of leadership that will be required to solve the deeper, underlying problem? Did he seize on the spill to push for a fundamental shift in our thinking, and will he continue to do so? The answer to those questions has to be Yes." Washington Post

    "Trying to schedule a vacation — or even a weekend away — has proven next-to-impossible for the first family, world events keep conspiring to mess up their plans." Washington Post

    The Obama administration has been engaged with the oil spill from the start – however haltingly and inarticulately at times.

    Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2010/0

    "The Obama administration has been engaged with the oil spill from the start – however haltingly and inarticulately at times." NY Times

    "You know, if you think government is the center of national life, government can do everything, then you're disappointed." NBC

    But the lamestream media has NO bias favoring Democrats.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *