The Republican 20 Percenters

Categories:

During the long cold winter of January 2009, Republicans were dreading the impending thaw of an Obama Administration. It was just after the massive “compassionate conservative” bank bailouts, the economy was hemorrhaging millions of jobs and yet a CBS/New York Times poll reported President George W. Bush still had a 22% approval rating.

Tea Party msnbc.com GOP
Cartoon by Daryl Cagle – msnbc.com (click to purchase)

It was the end of a disastrous second term, a bitter end to a bitter era. It was back when the best thing anyone could say about Bush was, “He showed some great reflexes when he dodged those shoes, huh?” So one could guess around 22% is pretty much the core of the Right. The die hards. The ones who will forgive anything (i.e. Katrina, no WMDs, children left behind etc.). Biker gangs have their “one percenters” ““ Republicans have their 20 percenters. They too should get a patch. Republicans like leather, right?

Speaking of respectable Republican cloth coat’s, even President Richard Nixon had a 27% approval rating months before he resigned, of course that was a more polite era ““ less slander more assassinations. The point is, the nucleus of Republicans is absolutely committed to their guys regardless. Twenty percent is the baseline number ““ the base.

Put a necktie on a German Shepherd who’s strong on defense and hates taxes and if he’s a Republican he will get at least a 20% approval rating nationally (as long as he’s not openly gay or Mormon). He doesn’t even have to be running for anything. Just wearing something that has a flag pin attached so people will know he loves freedom.

Last year an Associated Press-GfK poll found only 21% of adults now identify themselves as Republicans. This is much smaller than just a couple months prior at 28%. And since the now sainted and intellectually irreproachable President Ronald Reagan said the 11th Commandment is “Thou shalt not speak ill of any fellow Republican,” the party now has tons more Americans they can speak ill of. They are less than a quarter of adults currently; leaner and meaner.

So it is not surprising to hear a Gallup Poll report that 28% of Americans support the Tea Party. One can assume that it’s mainly Republican support and so it’s not a coincidence the devout of the GOP hovers around that same number.

What is surprising is to hear is Republicans or Tea Partiers calling themselves the “silent majority,” a throwback to the some Republican Revolution rhetoric back when family values House Speaker Newt Gingrich was still on his second wife. Now “silent majority” is a double misnomer due to their decibels and their numbers. Even if no Tea Baggers were Republicans and vice versa, if you added the two groups together currently, according to the data, they would still not be a majority of Americans.

The majority of Americans voted for Barack Obama. They did. By an overwhelming margin. He was the better candidate. Our economy was in a freefall. They voted for a policy wonk. They voted for the candidate who won the debates. They voted for a dude whose middle name is the same as an evil dictator’s last name we took out because it wasn’t relevant. That’s the actual majority.

According to a Winston Group study that came out this month, 86% of the Tea Partiers are over 34 years old. Are they the “new” GOP? For the most part they put the “old” in the Grand Old Party. They’re older Americans who are upset their candidate wasn’t good enough. They’re angry. They’re afraid of “change” but like to threaten revolution and secession. They get so much press because of the novelty of America’s crotchety great-aunts and uncles shaking their Medicare covered fists at The Man. It’s like the soda ads where old people drink Pepsi and start acting like crazy teenagers. But it’s tea!

But no matter how much attention they receive, they are still the 20 Percenters.

—–

Tina Dupuy is an award-winning writer and the editor of FishbowlLA.com. Follow Tina on Twitter @TinaDupuy.


Comments

13 responses to “The Republican 20 Percenters”

  1. Syncopation Avatar
    Syncopation

    What's a tea party protester made of?

    Huffington Post:

    Abusive, derogatory and even racist behavior directed at House Democrats by Tea Party protesters on Saturday left several lawmakers in shock.

    Preceding the president's speech to a gathering of House Democrats, thousands of protesters descended around the Capitol to protest the passage of health care reform. The gathering quickly turned into abusive heckling, as members of Congress passing through Longworth House office building were subjected to epithets and even mild physical abuse.

    A staffer for Rep. James Clyburn (D-S.C.) told reporters that Rep. Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.) had been spat on by a protestor. Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.), a hero of the civil rights movement, was called a 'ni–er.' And Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) was called a "faggot," as protestors shouted at him with deliberately lisp-y screams. Frank, approached in the halls after the president's speech, shrugged off the incident.

    But Clyburn was downright incredulous, saying he had not witnessed such treatment since he was leading civil rights protests in South Carolina in the 1960s.

    "It was absolutely shocking to me," Clyburn said, in response to a question from the Huffington Post. "Last Monday, this past Monday, I stayed home to meet on the campus of Claflin University where fifty years ago as of last Monday… I led the first demonstrations in South Carolina, the sit ins… And quite frankly I heard some things today I have not heard since that day. I heard people saying things that I have not heard since March 15, 1960 when I was marching to try and get off the back of the bus."

    "It doesn't make me nervous as all," the congressman said, when asked how the mob-like atmosphere made him feel. "In fact, as I said to one heckler, I am the hardest person in the world to intimidate, so they better go somewhere else."

    Asked if he wanted an apology from the group of Republican lawmakers who had addressed the crowd and, in many ways, played on their worst fears of health care legislation, the Democratic Party, and the president, Clyburn replied:

    "A lot of us have been saying for a long time that much of this, much of this is not about health care a all. And I think a lot of those people today demonstrated that this is not about health care… it is about trying to extend a basic fundamental right to people who are less powerful."

  2. Syncopation Avatar
    Syncopation

    Want to see what a tea bagger looks like?

    Check out these pictures…. pretty foul stuff!

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/20/tea-part

  3. farmasea Avatar
    farmasea

    The people in those pictures look like members of a "white person" convention. So "representative" that it's sad they get any press at all.

  4. CarlE Avatar
    CarlE

    The majority of Americans voted for an intellectual, something missed over the last 8 years. Someone who graduated Magna Cum Laude from Harvard Law School as well as being president of the Harvard Law Review, not had a business degree purchased by daddy.

  5. Cal Avatar
    Cal

    What I like about Dupuy is she throws out red meat for both sides. Unlike Purcell and Martha Carr, she’s strongly opinionated and always lets it be known. She is, of course, rabidly partisan and only offers one side of the story. The opening paragraphs say it all as she omits how Democrats owned the congress the last two years when Bush was president as she lumps all things bad on him. Okay, that’s expected.

    Syncopation chimes in and does the same with a one-sided post from the Huff and Puff Post which is world renowned for its unbiased portrayal of issues…

    Andrew Breitbart initially offered $10,000 to anyone who could produce ANY evidence of even ONE such incident as the HP Post alleges. He has since increased that offer to $100k. Still no takers. I noticed the leftstream media has now started saying, “The YouTube video that keeps getting shown was taken AFTER most of the bad stuff happened.” But it fails to note that cameras were rolling before, during, and after from the media AND many private citizens with cell phone cameras and NOT ONE incident has been confirmed as true. Here is Breitbart’s original offer. (Can someone help CarlE understand this isn’t plagiarism? He’s been confused about the meaning of that word lately.)

    “If we let them get away with Saturday’s stunt — using the imagery of the Civil Rights era and hurtful lies to cast aspersions upon the tea party whole — then they really will have won the day.

    It’s time for the allegedly pristine character of Rep. John Lewis to put up or shut up. Therefore, I am offering $10,000 of my own money to provide hard evidence that the N- word was hurled at him not 15 times, as his colleague reported, but just once. Surely one of those two cameras wielded by members of his entourage will prove his point.

    And surely if those cameras did not capture such abhorrence, then someone from the mainstream media — those who printed and broadcast his assertions without any reasonable questioning or investigation — must themselves surely have it on camera. Of course we already know they don’t. If they did, you’d have seen it by now.”

    This obsession with maligning American citizens peacefully protesting the runaway spending of their government is akin to the way the Left attempts to denigrate Sarah Palin. It's become an obsession. In spite of the fact that there has never been an incident of violence or racism or anything else alleged at any tea party gathering, the Left will not let this narrative go. It’s like a pit bull that’s got a death grip on a neighbor’s ankle and it will not release it until shot. But saying something happened that fits the liberal political narrative is easier than examining the movement, its people, and its causes. farmasea's quip is a perfect example of lazy intellectualism. Maybe he or SinkFull will be the first to claim the reward.

    Teabaggers? Aren’t teabaggers gay men who dip their scrotums in other men’s mouths? I had to Google it, but I’m pretty sure that’s what the term means. Is there possibly some projecting going on here? You, know. The real deal kind of teabagger as opposed to those who are using the Boston Tea Party as the basis for their protests? I don't personally care what any two consenting adults do but I find this obsession with teabagging (and Sarah Palin) fascinating.

    I like the stat. “86% are over 34.” I was wondering if it would be “over 26” as that’s the new age for “children” who can be covered my mommy and daddy’s insurance. I’m guessing Teenster’s under 34 so those folks look like geezers to her. What she doesn’t understand is that her ghostly face will be a wrinkled ghostly face before she knows it. Ah, the impetuous nature of youth!

    CarlE. You're aware that Bush had a higher GPA than Al Gore, aren't you? That isn't saying much but still…

  6. geoff Avatar

    Speaking of the "old GOP" (and isn't Cal supposed to be down in Florida?):
    http://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/stateroundu

  7. farmasea Avatar
    farmasea

    Teabagging involves mouths and scrotums but is not "just for men."

  8. geoff Avatar

    Hey, Cal: as far as I know, that offer of $10,000 (maybe even more) for evidence that George W ever reported for duty in Alabama is still up for grabs. That kind of offer doesn't mean much, does it?

    Speaking of, um, evidence; remember how only a few short weeks ago all them Konsurvtive folks were wetting their pants because a few lines taken out of context from a huge pile of e-mails was evidence that the UEA posed a "clear and eminent threat" (or words to that effect)? Well, seems like it might have been a "Saddam has WMD and is going to attack Iowa right NOW!!! if we don't do anything (and the sky is falling!!!) kind of moment after all:
    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/15/science/earth/1

  9. Manasseh Avatar

    Obama did not win a single debate. Hillary kicked his ass. Hence why he refused to debate with her again.

  10. Cal Avatar
    Cal

    farmasea. Thanks. That bit of clarification was really helpful. I’ll keep that in mind as the left handers continue the “teabagger” drumbeat. I’m sure that’s exactly what they have in mouth—er, _mind_ when they use that term.

    I love those guys because they recoil at using words to describe groups of people. You know, like gay Americans. They even want “special” laws passed to punish people more who harm someone from one of their pre-approved groups. But of course the compassion goes right out the window when those people are members of a conservative group. Then namie-names are just fine. It’s all just so very impressive and inspiring to behold.

  11. CarlE Avatar
    CarlE

    This is the first time I have heard of Breitbart making the offer, but then the demographic of his readership is old white men who prefer reading only rabid right postings. How incredibly bizzare that Cal would even suggest that the tea partiers are only peaceful protestors. You obviously don't watch mainstream news. Otherwise you would regularly see the shouters. There is much fim footage of the members of Congress being shouted at that day. Only the truly dimwitted question the authenticity of the homophobic and racist remarks shouted at Franks and Lewis.

    Given Bush's extemporaneous speech making he couldn't speak with clarity to save his life, hence the belivability of references to his low IQ.

  12. Cal Avatar
    Cal

    “Otherwise you would regularly see the shouters. There is much fim footage of the members of Congress being shouted at that day.” The shouters? Ooooh, ahhhh. Not someone “shouting!” Oh my God. Someone in America is shouting? That constitutes an angry mob! A veritable riot! That certainly can’t be a peaceful if _someone_ shouts. CarlE, I have to hand it to you. After such ridiculous posting last week as “dumb dumb dubbya” you really nailed it with this one. Shouting is really horrific. It’s the same sort of thing we see young liberals do at G-8 protests where they break windows, burn cars, and hurl rocks at police, right? You know, at those _peaceful_ protests. But that one guy in the white ball cap who was shouting—he’s a racist, sexist, bigot, homophobe for sure! There you go. This is violence pure and simple. Speaking of simpletons, hey CarlE!

    Based on your continued use of the terms “old” and “white” I have to wonder if you might possibly harbor some very deep-seated racist feelings yourself. No one uses those kinds of terms unless they do. Does that shoe possibly fit, CarlE? If not, why do use the term “white” in such a derogatory manner so often? Regardless of your reasoning or rationale, it still smacks heavily of racism and the only the truly dimwitted make those kinds of comments. Racists are the dregs of society no matter what side of the fence they sit their sorry, hate-filled, dumb asses on.

    Why won’t Lewis go on television to defend his assertions if he’s right? We’ve all seen the same tape run over and over and over. What’s he afraid of? Getting caught in a lie? There were cameras rolling the entire time, both TV and personal, and not ONE of them has a single incident captured. Why? IT DIDN’T HAPPEN my ignorant friend. It just didn’t happen. Nor did the “spitting” incident he alleges unless maybe the “seditious shouter” sprayed when he brayed. There’s a hundred grand with his (or your) name on it if you’ve got proof. Or you can do what you usually do. Just boldly claim it’s so with zero evidence and let that stand as your “hard fact.” (Shall I list several of your other “known facts” yet again my intelligence-challenged, dimly lit bulb?)

    Oh, and that was a SUPERB analysis of Brietbart. It’s destined to become a classic I’m sure.

    CarlE, always boldly pushing the boundaries on the stupidity frontier. And shamelessly at that…

    Can someone please tell me who this guy "Franks" is and what "fim" means?

  13. Jack Sprat Avatar
    Jack Sprat

    "The Republican 20 Percenters"

    As opposed to Democrat 20 percenters, recent polls showing that. "Only 22 percent of Americans surveyed by Pew say they can trust government in Washington "almost always or most of the time" — among the lowest measures in the half-century since pollsters have been asking the question."

    Quite tellingly the other two lows since 1958 when the polls began were during the Clinton and Carter administrations.

    I vote that Tina, might use the Democrat 20% and maybe take some of the bright red Bozo the clown lipstick to the "20%" line.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *